
From tony@math.sunysb.edu Fri Feb 11 13:51:38 2000
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 13:50:14 -0500 (EST)
From: Tony Phillips <tony@math.sunysb.edu>
To: Bill Casselman <cass@math.ubc.ca>
Cc: Tony Phillips <tony@math.sunysb.edu>
Subject: Re: see below



On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Bill Casselman wrote:

> Have you looked at
> 
> http://www.math.utsa.edu/ecz/ak001.html
> 

Yes I just came back from interlibrary loan where I
requested copies of his and Bromley's articles.

> and subsequent pages?
> 
> There are a couple of fascinating things in it.
> One of them is that his explanation of differential gearing
> seems to me quite confusing.  Good fodder for your column,
> I would guess, and my drawings.
> 

Right!! I claim that essentially nobody understands differentials.
I'm pretty smart and good at visualization but I still don't
feel completely comfortable with the mechanism. I'd like to
have the column focus just on differential gears: this is
the conceptually (vs. technologically) amazing part of the
Antik. Device as I see it. Goals: A: have the reader grok
how the differential works. B: reacquaint the public with
this mind-blowing bit of the history of science. (Isn't this
your period? As I remember all you got from Harvard was 
Mary, a good math education and an encyclopedic knowledge of 
mediterranean history 5BC-5AD). 

If you are interested in a Java-animation process (as I hope
you are) you should know the exact numbers of teeth in the
A.D.'s differential. 

(from Price TAPS  reds: 48 & 48
                  green: 192
                  blues: 32, 64, 32
colors as in my illustration which seems to have turned out
upside-down with respect to Price: my "top" is his "back".)

I'll sketch out a column on the golden-mean proof and you
can see what you think.

Tony


From tony@math.sunysb.edu Fri Feb 25 09:16:39 2000
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 09:14:34 -0500 (EST)
From: Tony Phillips <tony@math.sunysb.edu>
To: cass@math.ubc.edu
Cc: Tony Phillips <tony@math.sunysb.edu>
Subject: visualX.html

I have reordered the material to make it
less nugatory (is that the word I want? -ugly critter).
Please have a look.   

