Homework 1

MAT336 - History of Mathematics

Notes

Problems

  1. Find a quotation about mathematics that includes or implies a definition (of mathematics) and explain what you think it means. Discuss whether you agree or not and explain your reasons.
    1. Create a hypothesis as to the meaning of the scratches on the Ishango bone or why they might have been made. Be creative. The only requirement is that your hypothesis matches the pattern exhibited in the bone.
    2. Discuss whether your hypothesis fits in with what we know of math history at that point.
  2. For each of the following topics,
    1. Mathematics in Ancient Egypt
    2. Mathematics in Ancient Mesopotamia
    3. Mathematics in Ancient China
    4. find a primary and secondary source. Include a photo of the primary source as well as a brief description and the date. For the secondary source, include a complete reference (A link is not enough, you need to write down author, title, journal, date, etc)
  3. When and by whom was x used first as an unknown? Give a complete reference (as indicated in the previous problem) to your answer and explain why you believe the source you quoted is correct.
  4. Units of time, such as a day, a month, and a year, have ratios. In fact, you probably know that a year is about 365 1/4 days long. Imagine you had never been taught that fact.
    1. How would you -how did people originally- determine how many days are are in a year?
    2. What do you think was the utility of a calendar for very ancient societies? Write down two possible uses of calendars for them.
  5. In what sense is it possible to know the exact value of a number such as √2. Obviously, if a number is known only by its whole infinite decimal expansion, nobody does know and nobody will ever know the exact value of this number. What immediate practical consequences, if any, does this fact have? Is there any other sense in which one could be said to know this value exactly? If there is no direct consequences of being ignorant of its exact value, is there any practical value in having the concept of an exact square root of 2? Why not simply replace it by a suitable approximation such as 1.41421? Consider also other "irrational" numbers, such as π and e. What is the value of having the concept of such numbers as opposed to approximate rational replacements for them.
Note: The last two problems are adapted from the Roger Cook's book History of Mathematics: A Brief Course, Roger Cooke, 2005, Wiley-Interscience.