MAT336: History of Mathematics

Fall 2025

Presentation Guidelines and Grading Rubric

About the Topic

About the Presentation

Grading Rubric

Criteria Excellent (Full) Good (Partial) Needs Improvement Not Demonstrated Points
Mathematical Content Deep understanding; a nontrivial example is clearly explained step by step Mostly clear, with minor gaps Unclear or shallow explanation Concept misunderstood or missing /30
Historical Content Deep, accurate, and well-integrated Accurate, but could be more fully developed Basic coverage, lacks depth Inaccurate or missing /30
Teaching Clarity Clear teaching goal, good pacing, and actively engages the audience Mostly clear; some engagement; minor issues with pacing or structure Unfocused or hard to follow; little audience awareness No clear goal or effort to connect with audience /15
Delivery & Language Confident, accessible; not reading from slides; presentation is 8–10 minutes Some reading; mostly clear language; slightly over/under time Heavy reading or jargon; significantly too short or too long Mumbled, read-only, unclear language; far off from time requirement /10
Creativity Original approach; personal perspective; non-standard but effective structure or style Some originality or unique elements Few original ideas; mostly standard format No creative effort; generic presentation /5

Notes