Instructor and students |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
General understanding |
Shows a thorough and thoughtful understanding of the material. |
Shows a good understanding of the material |
Shows a basic understanding of the material |
Shows little understanding of the material |
Math point |
Fully and eloquently articulates mathematical concepts. Develops connections among mathematical concepts. |
Clearly articulates mathematical concepts |
Explains mathematical concepts without difficulty, but expresses ideas in rudimentary form. |
Displays errors in knowledge of mathematical concepts. Or there is very little mathematical content. |
Examples |
Well chosen, relevant and clear examples |
Appropriate examples. |
Adequate examples with minor flaws |
No examples or flawed examples. |
Slides |
Information on slides reflects deep understanding and effective summarization. Information has not simply been copied and pasted from another source. Slides display elements of effective design. Fonts, colors, backgrounds, etc. are effective, consistent and appropriate to the topic and audience. |
Information on slides reflects understanding and good summarization. Information has not simply been copied and pasted from another source. Slides display elements of appropriate design. Fonts, colors, backgrounds, etc. are occasionally distracting. |
Summarization and Information on slides is adequate. Some displays have been copied from other source. Design is adequate. |
No or little understanding is reflected on the slides. There is too much text on the slides. Or not enough information. Or information has been copied and pasted from other sources. Design is not apropriate. |
Logic and organization |
The presentation has a clearly defined structure with elegant transitions and an effective introduction |
The presentation has a clearly defined structure with some clear transitions and a logical introduction and conclusion |
The presentation has a recognizable structure with an introduction and conclusion |
The presentation has no clearly defined structure, or the structure is chaotic |
Technical content |
Compelling, engaging content that covered the topic thoroughly, was interesting to class members, and taught them something. |
Content was pretty thorough but lacked in some areas; audience members benefited from the presentation; |
The content was weak in coverage but engaging at times, class members took away something interesting; |
The content was not stimulating to audience members; presented just in order to minimally satisfy the requirement; |
Only the instructor |
Yes |
No |
|
|
Outline and slides submitted on time |
|
|
|
|
Presentation was ready by rehearsal |
|
|
|
|
Conceptual understanding | Mathematical errors |
Apparent | Minor |
A bit less than apparent | A couple |
Adequate | A few |
Less than adequate | Possibly many |
Lacking | |
Lacking |